Ramblings on Out of the Silent Planet

Out of the Silent Planet by C.S. Lewis book cover
Apologies for how enormous this picture is...

The lovely Maidens of Green Gables are hosting a Faith Filled Fiction Blog Party – do hop over and check it out! As you may have deduced from the post title, I have decided to write about Out of the Silent Planet by C.S. Lewis. (First I was going to write an actual real review of it, then I was at least going to write a semi-structured post about Christian symbolism within it. But my brain Was Not Cooperating, so instead, here are random ramblings on Out of the Silent Planet for your reading pleasure.)

Although I think Perelandra is objectively the best of the Space Trilogy, and objectively my favorite, Out of the Silent Planet (hereafter abbreviated to OotSP; I could have done OSP, but OotSP looks funny and that pleases me) might be my favorite to read. It’s the coziest and most fun, and I am all for cozy and fun. As we would expect when C.S. Lewis is involved, however, OotSP is by no means a shallow science-fiction romp. C.S. Lewis goes in for allegory a good deal, as can be seen in the Chronicles of Narnia (though in the Space Trilogy, I’m not even sure you could call it allegory…since, within the story, it’s not exactly that truths are expressed through symbols; the truths are really happening, they just look different because the story takes place in a different world).

Now, for some random thoughts/musings on OotSP:

~ In constructing Malacandra (Mars, to we earthlings), Lewis had two distinct world-building concerns to deal with: creating a realistic interpretation of an un-fallen world, and creating a realistic interpretation of a planet with a completely different culture from ours. Both of these are balanced nicely. Purely from a geographical standpoint, Lewis paints a landscape which is attractive yet alien to our own experience, which fits in with both concerns. Lewis also chooses to people Malacandra with three different intelligent species that live in harmony with each other and complement each other – which also fits in with both concerns. All in all, in OotSP we encounter a world which is truly alien, but not grotesque.

Out of the Silent Planet by C.S. Lewis illustration
That big football-shaped thing is Weston’s spaceship, by the way.

~ Also, I think Lewis struck the ideal balance in creating our protagonist, Ransom; he both serves as a sort of “every-man” that we can understand and sympathize with, but is also brave enough, intelligent enough, and moral enough to serve as a fitting sort of ambassador of mankind to the Malacandrians. (Technically Weston and Devine were really the first ambassadors, but although they (sadly) give a pretty good picture of what humanity is often like, I would much rather be represented by Ransom, thank you very much.)

~ Speaking of Weston and Devine, I like that we’re given an accurate portrayal of the two main sorts of villainy in our two antagonists. Devine is the shallow kind of villain: he’s just looking to increase his own wealth, power, and luxury. Weston is the more complex kind of villain, the villain with a cause (in this case, the cause of opening up the way for humans to be able to “planet-hop,” to move to another planet when at some point in the future Earth begins to fail as a life-giving planet). Ironically, as Oyarsa points out, although Weston is so concerned with the future of humanity, he is not concerned at all with humans as individuals – the whole reason that Ransom is on Malacandra at all is because Weston and Devine kidnapped him and brought him there, under the impression that the Malacandrians wanted a human sacrifice. (They actually didn’t, by-the-by.) I find it very interesting – and since C.S. Lewis was a smart man, I doubt this was a coincidence – that Weston has his view of humanity pretty much exactly backwards. You can’t actually care about humanity as a whole without first caring about humans individually and personally. Weston didn’t really love humanity, he loved the idea of humanity.

~ I think it’s fascinating that on Malacandra, an un-fallen world, we still have the presence of the hnakra, a ferocious beast…and, what is more, that the hrossa – who are un-fallen intelligent creatures – hunt this beast and delight in hunting it. I think the point that Lewis is making here is that the love of risk and danger – even the pride and sense of accomplishment in killing something dangerous – is not, in itself, bad or unwholesome. Since we of the Silent Planet live in a fallen world, we often experience these desires in unwholesome ways, but the inhabitants of Malacandra can experience these emotions as they were meant to be: though they long to kill the hnakra, it’s not really because they bear any malice toward him; though each of them longs to have the honor of being the one to slay the hnakra, there is no envy or jealousy or unfair play, etc.

Out of the Silent Planet by C.S. Lewis hross illustration
A hross (shout-out to the artist, Vaughan Flanagan)

~ Tied into that, it’s interesting to see that sorrow does not seem to be unknown on Malacandra…death, for instance, is still present. I think this points to two things: one, even an unfallen world is not Heaven, and two: there can be occasions when sorrow is not necessarily a bad thing. (That being said, my understanding has always been that there would have been neither sorrow nor death on Earth if it weren’t for the Fall…so I may differ with Lewis in this point. Then again, just because that’s the way it was on Earth, does that mean it would be that way on another planet? I really don’t know.)

~ As an evangelization tool, I think it was genius of Lewis to set this in a different world. If he spoke of religion, of our fallen world, of angels and spiritual struggles, many readers would just tune it out and think it more “religious jaw” (to quote Mere Christianity). But because this is set in a different world, he can use different words to mean what is really the same thing, and people are interested.

~ It’s interesting that, although we see so many similarities spiritually between our world and Malacandra, we see something on Malacandra which we have no equivalent to on Earth: Oyarsa, a sort of guardian angel of the planet. That’s what makes Earth the Silent Planet – we have no Oyarsa to communicate with the Oyarsas of other worlds. It seems that Lucifer (the Bent One, as the Malacandrians call him – having no word for “evil,” since their world is un-fallen) would have been our Oyarsa, if he hadn’t rebelled – putting our whole planet in rebellion against good.

Well, that’s just scratching the surface of the musings OotSP can spark, but even ramblings must stop somewhere. What are some of your ramblings on Out of the Silent Planet?

Celebrating Faith Filled Fiction Blog Party: Hosted by the Maidens of Green Gables, March 15-18

Discover more from Starlight and Saucepans

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

14 Comments

  1. This was lovely! Thank you for yet another wonderful post on C.S. Lewis. I love your little snarky comments (I think Lewis would have been Quite Pleased) and this definitely does justice to OotSP. (Which is an inherently superior abbreviation).

    Ahem. Anyhow. To me, Out of the Silent Planet goes like this. Take Narnia, sci-fi it (that’s not grammatically correct but do you see me worrying about it? Not a chance), hide the allegory and Biblical truths a little more within the plot (okay, a lot more), and then put as its main character a very human, very average sort of guy. That’s Ransom. At heart a far superior person to the likes of Weston and Devine, but also not a hero. And that’s okay, because really are any of us heroes? Nuh-uh. Just like him, we get to watch as God unfolds His perfect plan for the redemption of humanity, all the while contending with the forces of evil and trying our very best to succeed. The best part, though? It really doesn’t matter if we succeed or not, because Christ already died for us. Which we really didn’t deserve, but He did it anyway!

    So that’s why I love this book. And there’s also the mind-blowing idea of other species existing, but not having the problem of sin because they didn’t succumb to it. That’s why Earth is the Silent Planet. What do you think of this idea? It’s sort of a mythology, but also an allegory for Creation, the Fall, and the Problem of Sin. Quite genius, no?

    Bebother and confusticate, this comment was far longer than I intended. Forgive me! And let me know what you think 🙂

    • Lizzie Hexam

      Oh, that is quite a compliment! I feel most flattered that you think C.S. Lewis would have been Pleased with my asides. : D (And I am glad to have your support on OotSP’s superiority.)

      Yes, exactly! We can all picture ourselves in Ransom’s place, because he’s just a normal human being, not some superhero or paragon of perfection. (Although I think it’s interesting to see how Ransom changes throughout the three Space Trilogy books and becomes less and less “ordinary”…I think it shows how continually working for God can make you grow.) I think it’s really quite a mystery, how God so often uses us – laden with faults as we are – for His work (as we continually see throughout the Space Trilogy!) And of course, the best way that we have to succeed is to let God work through us. It seems rather paradoxical, in a way, but it’s often when we put too much trust in our own virtue and think we can “do it all” that we fail.

      It is quite genius, indeed! I love the fact that by presenting to us the sinless world of Malacandra, Lewis is able to at the same time able to teach about our own very sinful world…it also just logically makes sense that, just because we fell, that in no way means that the inhabitants of another world would have. One thing I find interesting is that – if memory serves – I don’t think Lewis really differentiates between the rebellion of “the Bent One,” Lucifer, and Adam and Eve’s choice of sin. In this worldview presented in OotSP, how would it have looked if Adam and Eve hadn’t sinned but Lucifer had still rebelled? Perhaps God would have sent us another “Oyarsa” to take Lucifer’s place then…it seems unlikely that our planet would have still been the Silent Planet if we humans had not done our part to make it so.

      (No need to apologize! I love long comments…as you may be able to tell from my reply! ;))

  2. That is quite true—if we trust our own abilities it will never succeed, because we can’t do it all ourselves. Your second point is also an interesting one. In the world Lewis creates, what would have happened if…?

  3. I’ve never thought of OotSP as “cozy and fun”. . . It certainly is in comparison to the other two in the series, but it’s just so . . . otherwordly . . . and was kinda mind-boggling when I read it. Perhaps on a re-read it will be more cozy.

    Ransom is SUCH an interesting character. It took some convincing, but now I really like that Lewis made him such a nondescript guy in OotSP. (When I read this book, he rather annoyed me, but by the end of THS, I was nearly in tears when he was leaving. Heh.)

    Lewis’ worldbuilding is really impeccable. And the concept of different species and the Oyarsa are so convincingly well-executed. Why was the man so brilliant??

    Intriguing thought about hunting the hnakra . . . There are so many speculations that can rise from this series, which are fun to think about but can be dangerous to dwell on. Someday, thanks to God’s unfathomable grace, we will indeed live in an unfallen world!

    • Lizzie Hexam

      Heh, well…I see your point. But it somehow seems other-wordly in a cozy way to me? I think it may be partly because there’s much less of a sense of evil in this one than in the other two…Weston and Devine aren’t good people, certainly, but they’re more of a familiar kind of bad. They don’t seem like pure un-distilled evil like you get a sense of in the other books.

      The funny thing is that I think I like Ransom better in OotSP and Perelandra than THS! Though part of that might just be because we get a lot more of his inner thoughts in those two. I guess in THS he’s just grown so much that he doesn’t seem as…human anymore? (Which I should be happy about. Growth is a good thing. But I can’t relate to him so much then :P)

      C.S. Lewis was a smart, smart man…I am just blown away sometimes by how wise his insights are. That’s right, someday there will be an un-fallen world – and maybe then we’ll talk to Lewis himself about it!

  4. This is so interesting, because while I agree that Perelandra is objectively the best of the Space Trilogy, in terms of (at least) a compact plot, theme, point, &c, plus just the sheer imagination and creation of a world (by Lewis), I like the other two much, much more. XD (It has to do with me being FREAKED OUT by the Weston stuff. I just can’t handle anything that smacks of demonic possession, even if it’s clearly evil, and that doesn’t just smack of it, it is it. If that makes any sense.) Plus, I think I /get/ a lot more out of OotSP and THS, if that makes any sense? Things like the Inner Circle, and what it means to be human (from THS and OotSP, respectively).

    I love your observation about the hnakra! It’s an excellent point that loving risk and danger are not inherently bad things–as long as they’re properly balanced. One should love the risk and danger not for the sake of themselves, but for the sake of the abundant life on the other side. If that makes any sense at all. I’m trying to be Chestertonian and not doing it as well as Chesterton does. (Shocker.)

    Also, the Oyarsa are absolutely fascinating. I’ve actually talked to one of the priests I know about something akin to this; he postulates (I think with some backing from other theologians) that each country has a guardian angel (and possibly a devil, a la Screwtape) which has something to do with the unique flavour that each country has, at its best. Something to ponder…

    • Lizzie Hexam

      I completely understand that, because I am also easily freaked out by that sort of thing (part of why I enjoy reading OotSP more, even while I think Perelandra is technically the best). For me personally, though, I find THS more freaky that way than Perelandra…somehow the whole vibe of THS seems grosser to me, even though the demonic element is even more obvious in Perelandra. But yes, there were definitely great insights in it, and in OotSP. (Which is only to be expected in Lewis, of course.)

      (Also, this is entirely irrelevant, but your use of &c. pleases me exceedingly.)

      I think that’s true! It makes me think of Bl. Pier Gorgio Frassati – he loved mountain climbing, for (I think? I feel like I read this) its tingling feeling of alive-ness. (Heh, I suppose none of us can quite reach the level of Chestertonian-ness that Chesterton does!) But yes, like all things, a proper balance is necessary.

      I’ve heard things to that effect, as well…something to ponder, indeed. (Although, truth be told, I don’t usually think very much about spiritual warfare-type things as such…as aforementioned, it’s much too easy to freak me out, lol.)

  5. This was so interesting!!!! I haven’t read OotSP, but you have absolutely convinced me to, it sounds fascinating!! Thank you so much for your contribution, Lizzie!!

    • Lizzie Hexam

      I’m so glad you enjoyed it! It IS fascinating, and very well-done…I hope you like it!

  6. Great post, Lizzie! I hadn’t heard of this book before – your thoughts about the story were very interesting and the book’s storyline sounds very intriguing!

    • Lizzie Hexam

      Thank you! It is quite intriguing – do let me know what you think if you decide to check it out!

  7. Eva

    I found this post really interesting and informative, especially since I just finished listening to the Space Trilogy on audiobook (strangely enough, I liked That Hideous Strength the best)!
    I didn’t really understand Weston and Devine at first, but your explanation helped :).
    I’d love it if you made posts about the rest of the series!

    • Lizzie Hexam

      I commend you on your choice of audiobook 😀 No, I can see that! That Hideous Strength doesn’t appeal as much to me personally just because it’s not really my kind of book, but it’s still very good (I mean, of course; it’s C.S. Lewis. How could it not be good?).

      I’m glad my explanation was helpful! I believe that Lewis was basing Weston’s ideas (of trying to get the human race to live forever by planet-hopping) on a theory which was popular at the time. Obviously, as we can see from OotSP, Lewis didn’t much like this theory. 😛

      Aw, thank you! I may just have to add that to my list of post ideas 😉 Thanks so much for your comment!

Leave a Reply

I love comments on posts old and new, so please feel free to share your thoughts! (You know the drill...be charitable, be respectful, keep it clean and classy. All that jazz.)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *